.:HSTuners::::Hondas Wanted:: |
09-08-2005, 11:41 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Des Moines IA
Age: 39
Posts: 7,908
|
crazy sti setup.
__________________
93 Si H23vtec......soon to be 12lbs 95 Civic EX....automatic DD if you cant dazzle them with your brillance, baffle them with your bullshit. |
|
|
|
09-09-2005, 01:46 AM
|
#2 |
|
Mind Blowing
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cloud 69
Age: 45
Posts: 8,871
|
That's pretty fucking wild I'd say.
The question isn't why....it's why not! Skeet skeet skeet skeet!!!
__________________
I  JDM. I My Honda The epitome of stupidity is expressed so fluidly with the shity lyric theory you try to spit at me.  I CAN'T WAIT FOR SUMMER!!! |
|
|
|
|
09-09-2005, 02:28 AM
|
#3 |
|
Best...mod...ever
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: At the end of the longest line
Age: 44
Posts: 7,451
|
Either he's sucked all the timing out of that motor, has an intercooler the size of his trunk, or that engine won't last 6 months. It's adiabatic efficiency has to be absolute shit...especially with TWO turbos feed a twin screw (or roots...hard to tell) blower. I can't imagine what the intake temps must be like.
__________________
1984 1/2 Mustang GT350 #842, Faster than you...nuff said Anna Fan Club President/Dictator Someday, in the event that mankind actually figures out what it is that this world actually revoles around, thousands of people are going to be shocked and perplexed that it was not them. Sometimes this includes me. "If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever." - George Orwell Welcome to the new Amerika |
|
|
|
|
09-09-2005, 02:58 AM
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Az
Age: 44
Posts: 3,804
|
its beautiful.
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2005, 03:23 AM
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 548
|
Thats an insane setup. But it makes good sense, the guy saids the SC does the boosting until the TT can get into effect. But three boosters and its only cracking out around 400 (according to him...) that thing needs some tuning.
And that things running 6mpg   |
|
|
|
|
09-09-2005, 10:48 AM
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Des Moines IA
Age: 39
Posts: 7,908
|
it has stock internals.....thats why such low numbers.
__________________
93 Si H23vtec......soon to be 12lbs 95 Civic EX....automatic DD if you cant dazzle them with your brillance, baffle them with your bullshit. |
|
|
|
|
09-10-2005, 12:14 PM
|
#7 |
|
Banning Machine
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: My Garage, Va.
Posts: 5,547
|
I've talked to that guy (the owner) before on the phone. he is actually a great guy. I didnt know about this set-up. He used to be a Honda guy if I remember correctly
|
|
|
|
|
09-11-2005, 08:11 PM
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The stixx
Age: 39
Posts: 1,550
|
yea but....after 2300 its just dead weight? Couldnt he just get a smaller turbos and acheive something lower than 7100 full boost? it just seems like thats a waste of 3 grand to last what 3 secs? And even on stock internals 25 psi should still yeild more than just 100 hp wouldnt you think?
__________________
me from another forum (im the top geekz0r) the geekz0r (11:03:46 PM): basicly, look at it this way...the 6speed is the same is the 5speed in 2,3,4,5,and 6...only the speeds are different because of the fd the geekz0r (11:04:16 PM): so 2nd pulls like 1st in the 5speed, 3rd is like 2nd, etc. PortugeeTex (11:04:26 PM): so whats 1st like then? the geekz0r (11:04:49 PM): 1st is like hitting a cheeta in the ass with a tazer PortugeeTex (11:04:53 PM): lmfao |
|
|
|
|
09-11-2005, 09:32 PM
|
#9 |
|
Banning Machine
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: My Garage, Va.
Posts: 5,547
|
I agree. I never really agreed on any dual-charger set-up (except twin-turbo on 6 cylinders and up).... not to mention keeping the internals stock. Sometimes people do it just to say "they did it or they have it". I would've just stuck with a single GT40rr.
|
|
|
|
|
09-11-2005, 10:08 PM
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: the nasti nati
Age: 39
Posts: 130
|
definately.. gotta love having 2cyl. per turbo.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
09-12-2005, 01:55 AM
|
#11 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Az
Age: 44
Posts: 3,804
|
i kinda don't see the point in 2 turbo's, i could see one big turbo and the supercharger that'd make sense.
|
|
|
|
|
09-12-2005, 07:18 AM
|
#12 | |
|
Best...mod...ever
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: At the end of the longest line
Age: 44
Posts: 7,451
|
Quote:
Exactly. There's no point to it. One properly sized turbo would have made more power than this triple power adder setup. Hell...if he'd stuck with twin turbos he'd still be ok. But forcing already compressed air to be compressed again is just bad news. Like Arnel said, it's just one of those "look what I did just to do it" sort of setups. The fabrication looks top shelf, but the idea is just stupid.
__________________
1984 1/2 Mustang GT350 #842, Faster than you...nuff said Anna Fan Club President/Dictator Someday, in the event that mankind actually figures out what it is that this world actually revoles around, thousands of people are going to be shocked and perplexed that it was not them. Sometimes this includes me. "If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever." - George Orwell Welcome to the new Amerika |
|
|
|
|
|
09-12-2005, 02:34 PM
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: the nasti nati
Age: 39
Posts: 130
|
now I could see a bi-turbo on that car, which would make the SC pointless. either way its definately just something to show off.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
09-12-2005, 06:36 PM
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Age: 40
Posts: 2,856
|
It isn't pointless at all... using the supercharger, full boost comes on MUCH earlier in the rev range than it would with just a turbocharger... area under the curve wins races, not peak. That said, I wouldn't spend my money that way...
__________________
yeah, its that big |
|
|
|
|
09-12-2005, 06:51 PM
|
#15 | |
|
Best...mod...ever
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: At the end of the longest line
Age: 44
Posts: 7,451
|
Quote:
That might normally be true, but with roots or twin screw blower boost is more a function of throttle position. Mash it open and you'll probably see full boost somewhere between 2000-2500rpm. That's right around the area where a properly sized turbo (let alone two) should start working their magic. Plus, as I said before, you adiabatic efficiency would be total shit running full boost on a blower and 2 turbos. I like the looks of it...but it's just impractical.
__________________
1984 1/2 Mustang GT350 #842, Faster than you...nuff said Anna Fan Club President/Dictator Someday, in the event that mankind actually figures out what it is that this world actually revoles around, thousands of people are going to be shocked and perplexed that it was not them. Sometimes this includes me. "If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever." - George Orwell Welcome to the new Amerika |
|
|
|
|
|
09-12-2005, 08:40 PM
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: the nasti nati
Age: 39
Posts: 130
|
Quote:
you obviously dont understand. I said BI-turbo. A much smaller turbo which spools quickly to get a much larger turbo spooling as well. so yes, that would make the SC pointless. and a good point made above, with the twin screw it really wouldnt throw much boost in until 2-2.5 grand.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-13-2005, 12:56 PM
|
#17 |
|
Project Combat Honda
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Highland,OH
Age: 46
Posts: 7,985
|
Its not pointless... How many other people can say they are running a Twin Turbo/Supercharged setup. I bet his shop will get a little more attention. Maybe that was his point. Insane ideas tend to draw ignorant people with to much money to spend.
__________________
Racing Rice |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
