.:HSTuners::

09-07-2004, 06:13 PM

This is a time that a guy posted on my thread i opened at automotiveforums.com the guy has a 1.8 in crx and heres what he said.....

I have run a 14.7 at 91mph with a 2.1 60' with just an ebay short ram and a thermal cat back in a pretty heavy crx for a crx. It also had a broken motor mount.

I have run a fastest 93mph with the same setup with a shittier 60' so im sure it would see 14.5, 14.6's with better grip and that motor mount fixed.

Anything is possible, people should see quicker time's in lighter crx's. Im also on a diet trying to get my weight down. I can drive the car very well but im still a big guy and im sure that hurt's more than it helps.

__________________
1991 Honda Crx si
Best Time: 14.30 @ 98mph, 2.2 60'

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

09-07-2004, 06:13 PM	#1
rushb18 Posts: n/a	This is a time that a guy posted on my thread i opened at automotiveforums.com the guy has a 1.8 in crx and heres what he said..... I have run a 14.7 at 91mph with a 2.1 60' with just an ebay short ram and a thermal cat back in a pretty heavy crx for a crx. It also had a broken motor mount. I have run a fastest 93mph with the same setup with a shittier 60' so im sure it would see 14.5, 14.6's with better grip and that motor mount fixed. Anything is possible, people should see quicker time's in lighter crx's. Im also on a diet trying to get my weight down. I can drive the car very well but im still a big guy and im sure that hurt's more than it helps. __________________ 1991 Honda Crx si Best Time: 14.30 @ 98mph, 2.2 60'