.:HSTuners::

2ndGenTeg · 05-18-2004, 12:39 AM

Alright, check this out. It's like an SAT question.

Boost and high compression require a high octane rating.

Boost and high compression equal high preformance.

True or false: High octane equals high performance.

FALSE. It's like the good ol' all squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares.

I've been saying all along that boost and high compression require a high octane rating. Your example is boosted. Like I said- proving me right, all along.

Find me a dyno of an NA motor running normal compression that gains even 5 hp off of premium gasoline, and I will concede defeat.

Running premium gasoline on an engine that doesn't require it is sheer ignorance, as is attempting to argue it without all the facts. You simply don't process information well, then you attempt to respond with a lack of understanding of what has been said. Replying is a three step process.
1. Read what has been said.
2. Think.
3. Reply.
You seem to be skipping the first two steps.

And "douche" has a "u", phucktard.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-18-2004, 12:39 AM	#1
2ndGenTeg 4th Gear Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Boulder, CO Age: 45 Posts: 830	Alright, check this out. It's like an SAT question. Boost and high compression require a high octane rating. Boost and high compression equal high preformance. True or false: High octane equals high performance. FALSE. It's like the good ol' all squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. I've been saying all along that boost and high compression require a high octane rating. Your example is boosted. Like I said- proving me right, all along. Find me a dyno of an NA motor running normal compression that gains even 5 hp off of premium gasoline, and I will concede defeat. Running premium gasoline on an engine that doesn't require it is sheer ignorance, as is attempting to argue it without all the facts. You simply don't process information well, then you attempt to respond with a lack of understanding of what has been said. Replying is a three step process. 1. Read what has been said. 2. Think. 3. Reply. You seem to be skipping the first two steps. And "douche" has a "u", phucktard.