.:HSTuners::

10-22-2002, 06:04 PM

Are shocks and struts the same? Does my civic have both? Whats the difference between them/how do they work?

thanks alot for the info.

ebpda9 · 10-22-2002, 06:20 PM

shocks usually just dumpen the motion of the spring while the strut acts as a shock and a spring (but not to the extent a spring does) hoever there is not too much difference between the 2 and can be refered as both.

10-22-2002, 07:00 PM

A shock limits the amount of time the sping takes to compress, then quickly allows it to rebound (eliminating constant bouncing).
A strut does the same, but there is one major difference, A strut also provides lateral load bearing, whereas a shock does not.
To use a shock, you need a spring, and two arms, an upper, and lower. The arms do all the location work (keeping the wheel straight up and down). A strut eliminates the upper control arm, and uses a very strong rod to locate the upper end of the wheel. The strut does not allow a fine degree of suspension tuning (only goes up and down linerarally), and that is why people complain about the struts in the new civic. The gemometry is compromised, becuase you want more than simple up and down in suspension, since when a vehicle corners, the body rolls, causing the wheel angle to change. A two-arm suspension can compensate for this through static geometry, but a strut cannot. So they lean the strut inwards (camber) and hope all goes well.

10-22-2002, 07:05 PM

A shock limits the amount of time the sping takes to compress, then quickly allows it to rebound (eliminating constant bouncing).
A strut does the same, but there is one major difference, A strut also provides lateral load bearing, whereas a shock does not.
To use a shock, you need a spring, and two arms, an upper, and lower. The arms do all the location work (keeping the wheel straight up and down). A strut eliminates the upper control arm, and uses a very strong rod to locate the upper end of the wheel. The strut does not allow a fine degree of suspension tuning (only goes up and down linerarally), and that is why people complain about the struts in the new civic. The gemometry is compromised, becuase you want more than simple up and down in suspension, since when a vehicle corners, the body rolls, causing the wheel angle to change. A two-arm suspension can compensate for this through static geometry, but a strut cannot. So they lean the strut inwards (camber) and hope all goes well.

10-22-2002, 06:04 PM	#1
cashizslick Posts: n/a	What is the difference between shocks and struts? Are shocks and struts the same? Does my civic have both? Whats the difference between them/how do they work? thanks alot for the info.

10-22-2002, 06:20 PM	#2
ebpda9 Repost Wagon Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: over here Age: 44 Posts: 17,266	shocks usually just dumpen the motion of the spring while the strut acts as a shock and a spring (but not to the extent a spring does) hoever there is not too much difference between the 2 and can be refered as both. __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10-22-2002, 07:00 PM	#3
Solo2Man Posts: n/a	A shock limits the amount of time the sping takes to compress, then quickly allows it to rebound (eliminating constant bouncing). A strut does the same, but there is one major difference, A strut also provides lateral load bearing, whereas a shock does not. To use a shock, you need a spring, and two arms, an upper, and lower. The arms do all the location work (keeping the wheel straight up and down). A strut eliminates the upper control arm, and uses a very strong rod to locate the upper end of the wheel. The strut does not allow a fine degree of suspension tuning (only goes up and down linerarally), and that is why people complain about the struts in the new civic. The gemometry is compromised, becuase you want more than simple up and down in suspension, since when a vehicle corners, the body rolls, causing the wheel angle to change. A two-arm suspension can compensate for this through static geometry, but a strut cannot. So they lean the strut inwards (camber) and hope all goes well.

10-22-2002, 07:05 PM	#4
Solo2Man Posts: n/a	A shock limits the amount of time the sping takes to compress, then quickly allows it to rebound (eliminating constant bouncing). A strut does the same, but there is one major difference, A strut also provides lateral load bearing, whereas a shock does not. To use a shock, you need a spring, and two arms, an upper, and lower. The arms do all the location work (keeping the wheel straight up and down). A strut eliminates the upper control arm, and uses a very strong rod to locate the upper end of the wheel. The strut does not allow a fine degree of suspension tuning (only goes up and down linerarally), and that is why people complain about the struts in the new civic. The gemometry is compromised, becuase you want more than simple up and down in suspension, since when a vehicle corners, the body rolls, causing the wheel angle to change. A two-arm suspension can compensate for this through static geometry, but a strut cannot. So they lean the strut inwards (camber) and hope all goes well.