.:HSTuners::::Hondas Wanted:: |
01-01-2006, 12:03 PM | #1 |
R-Tard
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 612
|
HP Drop in Acura's?
Just notices a few things:
Acura RL 2005 HP 300hp, now 2006 its 290hp Acura TL 2005 HP 270, now 2006 its 258HP There are similar trends on the Honda side to. What gives? |
01-01-2006, 12:15 PM | #2 |
Banning Machine
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: My Garage, Va.
Posts: 5,547
|
it's the emission shit man. SULEV stuff.....
|
01-01-2006, 12:17 PM | #3 | |
R-Tard
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 612
|
Quote:
Since they all passed 2005 emissions have the emissions requirements changed for 2006? |
|
01-01-2006, 12:24 PM | #4 |
Banning Machine
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: My Garage, Va.
Posts: 5,547
|
I think it is more about having the least emission numbers, not so much of passing it. Most Honda motors from i-VTEC generation are detuned via computers and exhaust components. However, these i-VTEC motors also react pretty well with bolt-ons and aftermarket ECU upgrades to make up for power increase.....
|
01-01-2006, 02:12 PM | #5 |
Repost Wagon
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: over here
Age: 44
Posts: 17,266
|
i think it's the new SAE regulations in hp measurements
__________________
|
01-01-2006, 03:04 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 548
|
Same with the RSX...the remodeled 05 model came out with 210..the 06 got down to like 205.
|
01-01-2006, 04:57 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Des Moines IA
Age: 38
Posts: 7,908
|
i thought they changed the how they measured the power, like stefan said. would that be the problem?
__________________
93 Si H23vtec......soon to be 12lbs 95 Civic EX....automatic DD if you cant dazzle them with your brillance, baffle them with your bullshit. |
01-01-2006, 05:06 PM | #8 |
Best...mod...ever
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: At the end of the longest line
Age: 43
Posts: 7,451
|
Auto makers are also doing a preemptive strike on future emissions standards. They know years in advance what the standards will be for the future and it's no big deal to meet them now. Plus they can claim that they're doing good by meeting the standards of the future today.
__________________
1984 1/2 Mustang GT350 #842, Faster than you...nuff said Anna Fan Club President/Dictator Someday, in the event that mankind actually figures out what it is that this world actually revoles around, thousands of people are going to be shocked and perplexed that it was not them. Sometimes this includes me. "If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever." - George Orwell Welcome to the new Amerika |
01-01-2006, 09:05 PM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Age: 38
Posts: 5,446
|
Quote:
exactly, also with less horsepower wouldnt there be less fuel consumption? of course depending on the styling of the vehicle? maybe that would have something to do with it? |
|
01-01-2006, 10:17 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: northeastern connecticut
Age: 37
Posts: 1,765
|
eh, that's probably gauged more by displacement and driving habbits, but i'm sure it does hold some truth.
__________________
|
01-01-2006, 11:38 PM | #11 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Age: 38
Posts: 5,446
|
Quote:
well driving habits is always a variable, but if set with a constant. idk jsut seeing as how most of the low emissions, fuel conservative vehicles have low HP numbers. i mean my echo can easily get 40mpg if i drive nicely, but I'm one for running the rpm's up high lol I don't get 40mpg all the time. |
|
01-01-2006, 11:43 PM | #12 |
Repost Wagon
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: over here
Age: 44
Posts: 17,266
|
my legacy gets around 29mpg in the warmer weather and doesn't look as gay as an echo, plus it has to power to haul 5 asses inside the car
__________________
|
01-02-2006, 05:32 AM | #13 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Age: 38
Posts: 5,446
|
Quote:
11mpg more is a lot :-D and hey i didnt pay for the echo, free car > your car |
|
01-02-2006, 05:14 PM | #14 |
R-Tard
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 612
|
I dont think customers would thank you to know that cars have been de-tuned from one year to another. It has to be something along the lines of how they measure power. The mpg has not changed from one year to another.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|