.:HSTuners::

02_Si · 06-27-2003, 06:56 PM

What's the difference between these two... is one more flexible than the other, stronger, cheaper, suckier, less expensive??

*pdiggitydogg* · 06-27-2003, 07:33 PM

poly can flex...thats why they make body kits, motor mounts, suspension parts, etc out of it. Its more expensive for body kits, but its worth it...but shops cannot repair it if it is seriously damaged (where as fiberglass can be cheaply and quickly)

Fiberglass is stiff...

06-27-2003, 11:12 PM

fiberglass=junk, urethane=the stuff that lasts forever...

06-28-2003, 01:46 AM

ya if you damage a urethane part, you have to replace the whole thing, but fiberglass is easy to repair, but also extremely flimsy and easily breakable. Take a look at a stock civic's bumpers they are made of fiberglass, really crappy.

nonovurbizniz · 06-28-2003, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 93Honda
ya if you damage a urethane part, you have to replace the whole thing, but fiberglass is easy to repair, but also extremely flimsy and easily breakable. Take a look at a stock civic's bumpers they are made of fiberglass, really crappy.

Uh... no they're not..

my 93 civic has a urethane stock front and rear bumper... hardly ANY companies use fiberglass... when they do it's generally for body parts to drop weight not bumpers... it's much easier to mass produce molded plastics then molded fiberglass.. flat shapes are easy with fiberglass but moded ones' are realatively labor intensive.

bent_remy · 06-28-2003, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mischief(LTS)
fiberglass=junk, urethane=the stuff that lasts forever...

truth be told.

pimpinprelude · 06-28-2003, 07:32 PM

all corevetts and some parts on mustangs are fiber...

06-29-2003, 01:32 AM

my mistake, i could have sworn it was fiber glass, i've just been able to examine my rear bumper real well since it's hanging on for dear life lol. guess not though, oh well, urethane is better.

06-27-2003, 06:56 PM	#1
02_Si 2nd Gear Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: AZ@ Age: 42 Posts: 207	fiberglass, polyurethane.. what's the difference? What's the difference between these two... is one more flexible than the other, stronger, cheaper, suckier, less expensive?? __________________ The name is Tom, I am da bomb, if you can't remember, just ask yo' mom.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

06-27-2003, 07:33 PM	#2
pdiggitydogg Yahoo Watashi wa kattaze! Join Date: May 2002 Location: Meanwhile, up in The D... Age: 41 Posts: 10,579	poly can flex...thats why they make body kits, motor mounts, suspension parts, etc out of it. Its more expensive for body kits, but its worth it...but shops cannot repair it if it is seriously damaged (where as fiberglass can be cheaply and quickly) Fiberglass is stiff...

06-27-2003, 11:12 PM	#3
Mischief(LTS) Posts: n/a	fiberglass=junk, urethane=the stuff that lasts forever...

06-28-2003, 01:46 AM	#4
93Honda Posts: n/a	ya if you damage a urethane part, you have to replace the whole thing, but fiberglass is easy to repair, but also extremely flimsy and easily breakable. Take a look at a stock civic's bumpers they are made of fiberglass, really crappy.

06-28-2003, 07:32 PM	#7
pimpinprelude Registered User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Atlanta Age: 37 Posts: 1,325	all corevetts and some parts on mustangs are fiber...

06-29-2003, 01:32 AM	#8
93Honda Posts: n/a	my mistake, i could have sworn it was fiber glass, i've just been able to examine my rear bumper real well since it's hanging on for dear life lol. guess not though, oh well, urethane is better.