.:HSTuners::::Hondas Wanted:: |
04-16-2002, 12:01 AM
|
#1 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
what's quicker?
Base RSX
or RSX Type-S -Both are complete stock, no added options, no aftermarket products installed onto the car -Considering 200hp, but has more weight due to the power options, sub, etc. and that the 160hp doesn't have some of the luxuries of the Type-S I had an argument with one of my friends about this, he thinks the Base would keep up since it has less weight than the Type-S, but I disagree. |
|
|
04-16-2002, 12:07 AM
|
#2 |
|
Insomniac Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: OR
Age: 43
Posts: 11,142
|
I think the S has more than enough power to make up for any weight, so I'd go with the RSX-S in a race.
__________________
1994 Accord EX coupe --Need hosting for your pics on HST? PM me...-- |
|
|
|
04-16-2002, 01:17 AM
|
#3 |
|
Repost Wagon
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: over here
Age: 44
Posts: 17,266
|
RSX-S
__________________
 
|
|
|
|
|
04-16-2002, 01:30 AM
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
s. nuff said.
|
|
|
|
04-16-2002, 02:48 AM
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
they both suck. I MISS ITR
|
|
|
|
04-16-2002, 03:04 AM
|
#6 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
ITR is better...totally agree...
but please stick within topic.... not to find out what other car is quicker and better than the Base RSX and the RSX Type-S (sorry if i sounded rude or like a jack@ss....didn't mean to sound like that if you interpret it that way...just need to know about the 2 cars) |
|
|
|
04-16-2002, 03:05 AM
|
#7 | |
|
Insomniac Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: OR
Age: 43
Posts: 11,142
|
Quote:
Seems like the general concensus is the Type S... wouldn't you agree?
__________________
1994 Accord EX coupe --Need hosting for your pics on HST? PM me...-- |
|
|
|
|
|
04-16-2002, 05:02 AM
|
#8 | |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
I figured the question was already answered and you could have read it by now. Just my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
04-16-2002, 02:19 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
ohh okay....that's cool then... sorry if i sounded rude before.... |
|
|
|
|
04-16-2002, 08:33 PM
|
#10 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Well I own a RSX base model and the Type S is faster.
it has more torque and hp. the weight really doesn't make a difference but soon enough I'll be able to smoke em. |
|
|
|
04-16-2002, 08:40 PM
|
#11 | |
|
Insomniac Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: OR
Age: 43
Posts: 11,142
|
Quote:
Welcome to HS  You should post an intro for yourself in the new kid on the block forum.
__________________
1994 Accord EX coupe --Need hosting for your pics on HST? PM me...-- |
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2002, 09:14 AM
|
#12 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
RSX Type S
|
|
|
|
04-17-2002, 09:15 AM
|
#13 | |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Me too man. But the RSX-Type S would win its only about a 100 pound differnce so. The type s runs a 15.2 stock ITR 14.8 and looks a lot nicer Type R is much better. |
|
|
|
|
04-17-2002, 12:21 PM
|
#14 | |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Your definetely right about the type-r looking better, and it handles better. Does anyone know how their compression ratios compare??? I'm interested in knowing which has more turbo potential..... |
|
|
|
|
04-17-2002, 02:06 PM
|
#15 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I believe the Type R has a bit higher compression. The RSX would be a tad better for turbo'd stock internals. Not power wise but the fact that internals will last a bit longer.
|
|
|
|
04-27-2002, 03:55 AM
|
#16 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
awd 4g63 will win, o wait hehe the type S for sho
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
