View Single Post
Old 10-10-2002, 02:27 AM   #23
drdingo21
Registered User
 
drdingo21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Elkhart, IN
Age: 42
Posts: 1,642
Quote:
Originally posted by 94_AcCoRd_EX
One of the reasons your xp1600 is stomping the P4 is due to the increased FSB. I'm running a 1600+ on one of my rigs @ ~1830, stock voltages, on air @ 10.5 x 173FSB. It beats the crap out of my P4 2.0. This is also due to having fastest RAM timings, better components, etc. Overall, I agree that AMD is the way to go for the money.
your right about the increased fsb but the cpu its self is doing 5246 mips (million instructions per secound) while the p4 does 5014. on air thats pretty impressive nice
drdingo21 is offline   Reply With Quote