Quote:
Originally posted by V8killimports
Omg or maybe even the jews?? Either way they are not near as dangerous as saddam was.. I'll take the trade off.. and you talk about something I already did like 5 posts ago.. please read the entire thread instead of the last post.. thanks!
|
I didn't realize there was a limit to the number of posts that can pass preventing somebody from posting something that is related to a previous post. I always enjoy learning new rules..thanks!
Quote:
|
and now we're friends w/ a country we dropped 2 atomic bombs on, and best of friends w/ a country that this nation fought to be free from. so whats your point? that times change?
|
I'm just adding to the list of the government's bad track record in the past few decades of replacing one threat with another of equal or greater value. Sure we've had some successes along the way, back in WWII and previously.....I'm having a hard time thinking of any real successes since then.
Just how big a threat was Saddam? I'd like some evidence, not plaigiarized pre-Gulf War academic papers, forged intelligence documents, or other heresay.
While any kind of rebuilding of a country is a long and difficult process, I really won't be surprised if not too far in the future someone much worse than Saddam ever was or "was" will rise to power in the area as a result of Saddam's not being in power.
I dunno why everybody seems so edgy, but damn no need to just go jumpin on somebody for a simple post.
And nobody likes the French, including the French, and they don't like anybody either....so it's no surprise.
b