HSTuners - View Single Post

GT40FIED · 06-26-2004, 03:47 PM

That reaction time looks so-so and the 60ft looks like it could be better...but the e.t. and trap speed match up pretty well. If there is more to be had from that car, it's not much. But that confuses me. In the early 90s people were driving Mustangs to mid-low 14s with around 215 net hp. A B16A is sporting 170hp (or is it 160?...not like 10hp makes a huge difference) and the Hondas weigh less so shouldn't they be pulling high 14s at least?

06-26-2004, 03:47 PM	#17
GT40FIED Best...mod...ever Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: At the end of the longest line Age: 43 Posts: 7,451	That reaction time looks so-so and the 60ft looks like it could be better...but the e.t. and trap speed match up pretty well. If there is more to be had from that car, it's not much. But that confuses me. In the early 90s people were driving Mustangs to mid-low 14s with around 215 net hp. A B16A is sporting 170hp (or is it 160?...not like 10hp makes a huge difference) and the Hondas weigh less so shouldn't they be pulling high 14s at least? __________________ 1984 1/2 Mustang GT350 #842, Faster than you...nuff said Anna Fan Club President/Dictator Someday, in the event that mankind actually figures out what it is that this world actually revoles around, thousands of people are going to be shocked and perplexed that it was not them. Sometimes this includes me. "If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever." - George Orwell Welcome to the new Amerika