HSTuners

HSTuners (http://www.hstuners.com/forums/index.php)
-   Shifting Gears - Off Topic Discussions (http://www.hstuners.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Its got mivec....only on the intake side (http://www.hstuners.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25492)

pdiggitydogg 10-10-2005 11:58 PM

Its got mivec....only on the intake side
 
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051010/...supersonic_jet

Cali to Japan in 4hrs would be awesome. Count me in

Mischief 10-11-2005 12:42 AM

and to think we only have to wait until 2025 till we get one!!

AzCivic 10-11-2005 01:36 AM

whats the difference between this and the concorde other than this holds more people?

GT40FIED 10-11-2005 02:38 AM

I've seen stuff about work on planes that would fly outside the earth's atmosphere that could convievably reach mach 18 since there's no wind resistance. Theoretically it could go from LA to NY in under an hour or something.

Racing Rice 10-11-2005 08:04 AM

Where do I sign up?

ChrisCantSkate 10-11-2005 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by GT40FIED
I've seen stuff about work on planes that would fly outside the earth's atmosphere that could convievably reach mach 18 since there's no wind resistance. Theoretically it could go from LA to NY in under an hour or something.
the sr71 blackbird already can make it from NY to LA in under an hour and i dont thinhkl that breaks mach 4. mach 18 would put you around the world in almost an hr. but i dont think thats feasable for passenger flights because of the G forces needed to get up there, up to that speed, and slow down from that speed would kill some people.

differences between this and the concord? well its a different design by different engineers, its gonna probobly be like the 747 and the airbus. both big commercial jet liners, just designed different and by a different company. and the concord was made in the late 60's, this is 40 years later. we have better technology

CD5Passion 10-11-2005 09:40 PM

wow nice.

VR4_Craver 10-11-2005 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AzCivic
whats the difference between this and the concorde other than this holds more people?


ItS JDM y0 Right Hand Joysticks

Exactly though...the concorde all got grounded because it was to expensive to fly them because they use WAY to much gas and arent economical. :eek:

AzCivic 10-11-2005 10:14 PM

maybe this has vtec-e

pdiggitydogg 10-11-2005 11:01 PM

nah its mitsubishi heavy industries

AzCivic 10-11-2005 11:16 PM

damn didnt catch that, my bad. :D

Racing Rice 10-12-2005 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by pdiggitydogg
nah its mitsubishi heavy industries


So its got a "Double shot of NAWS!":D

VR4_Craver 10-13-2005 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by GT40FIED
I've seen stuff about work on planes that would fly outside the earth's atmosphere that could convievably reach mach 18 since there's no wind resistance.


The U2 planes that would fly so high you could see the actaul curvature of the earth the only problem there is that it would way to expensive because at those kinds of altitudes you have to wear a special suit because blood actually boils outside of that special suit would be cool though

AzCivic 10-13-2005 05:18 PM

if they could keep the interior of the whole plane at the right pressure it'd be doable, but they'd be f'd if they lost pressure.

VR4_Craver 10-14-2005 06:42 PM

Yea they couldnt do it to a plane carrying 1 person let alone 300 hundred people...besides that ONE test cost 100 MILLION dollars imagine what a ticket on that bastard would cost?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 HSTuners.com