94 civic vs some audi...
 

Well i was driving down this 4 lane road a when all of a sudden this audi flys up on me then switchs to the other lane and starts to pace me... Well i ingored him for a bit till we came to a light. When i looked over its some stupid kid, he doesn't look at me doesn't rev or anything just sits there staring straight ahead, so i figured he didn't wanna race he was just being an ass.

So the light turns green and start to go (not a race go, just a normal go) and he was at my door, then all of a sudden i see his car lunge back then almost right away he was even with me. I was still in 1st gear running at 3k so i punched and put him back at my door and started to pull then i hit 6800 rpms (redline) i go to shift to second and snapped my short throw shifter right under the shift knob. Needless to say i didn't make second..and he beat me ;(



my night sucks...i also have something else wrong with my car ontop of me snapping the dam shifter..

Damn, you snapped the shifter? Nice attempted kill :cool:

thats brutal

that sucks that it broke

yea i guess thats what i get for buy a sorta chepie shifter...


But i do have a plan! It broke about an inch and half off, so as i type this (im taking a break for a second) Im rethreading the shifter further down and ill have shorter shifts yet!

Won't taking 1.5" off of a SS make the shifting too notchy?

well, im finishing up now then ill go take it for a spin and see and ill let you know. but i don't think so...

either way i don't wanna crawl underneth my car to put the old one back in its like 15 degress outside...

i just drove it around for about an hour and handed a newer blazer his ass....I must say i like it like this ALOT more. It seem tighter and the throws are noticbly shorter...Also after i looked at the pice again its only about an inch off.

That's cool... glad it worked out for ya

thx. but it didn't reall work out;) my hand is freakin killing me from rethreading the shifter!:pfft:

need to leave those audi's alone.....they are the most feared thing on the autobaun here..... imagine going 130 mph and a audi STATION WAGON pulls up on your tail flashing you..... :bow: audi's are not lightweights...unless you make some serious power leave them alone.

yep, well the audis here suck. Ive beaten 3 or 4 before.. and this one i had beat while still in first gear...

Well maybe you are talking about a 10 year old Audi, but the A4, A6, A8 and TT will own you. The A8 is an aluminum body with about 350 or so hp. We just bought a TT and looked at all of these. TT runs about 14.1 in the quarter. That's your best bet.

the S8 is amazin :bow: :bow:

not to be a cock but id pay money to see a stock from the factory TT do 14.1 in the 1/4:yes:

You must shift pretty hard. I have some cheapy and its lasted a good while.

Nice job on "version 2" of the short shifter.

What kind of Audi?
 

I had an old 86 4000cs quattro. It was pretty fast. The engine was a small 5cyl 2.2 litre that put out 115 horse. It was a pretty close race against an EX but the Audi usually won. Shouldnt happen considering the EX has more horse power and is about 600 pounds lighter, guess it may have had something to do with AWD, if you launched with quattro, the tires hardly spin and the car gets up to speed very quickly

Re: What kind of Audi?
 

The tires never spin with the quattro. And 14.3 is actually best in the TT. Audi makes a quick little car. It's actually my wifes, and with some mods want to get it to 300hp.

cool just asking, cause i was reading motor trend and they threw an aftermarket exhaust and intake and suspension on and it only ran a string of mid 14's and a 14.4:yes:

or maybe i was talking about the new audis (which i was) And ive raced 3 or 4 and never lost to any of them..

Civic ex vs. audi s4 NEXT on cnn!:loco:

Maybe if your car is modded and it was a 180hp TT. Other than that they are quick. Especially if you are talking about the A6 and up. And the 225's with $1500 in mods can get upwards of 275hp. They even have ones with VR6 motors making 500+ hp if you are willing to foot the $30,000. What are your mods?

Hehe civic ex would get dominated by the S4... in every single category known to man...

ok since audis are volkwagons id love to see you go up against a 1.8TURBO 4 DOOR JETTA 5 SPD equiped with the following:

AGR OR WHATEVER THE NAME IS PERFORMANCE CHIP

CAI

EXHAUST

OUTCOME +42RWHP +118FT LBS TQ. DONT BELIEVE ME GO TO

WWW.RACINGFLIX.COM AND LOOK FOR THE 13.9 JETTA, go to forum and loot for adam20v and talk to him about his mods ;(

MY ****ING MUSTANG HAS TROUBLE TAKING THOSE BUGGERS OUT id love to see a short throw equipped ex do it ;)

open up your eyes bro..

im not gonna aruge with you. Its pointless and a waste of my time... All i said was i beat 3 or 4 audis thats all.

And when did i say it was the 1.8 turbo?

If it was a 1.8 it was turboed. Audi seems to make all 14.5 second 1/4 mile cars. They are all quick nowadays. And if it wasn't a TT then a A4? A6? I don't think so. Sorry but: :bs:

Audi TT's are not really that quick, now a S4 has potential, and a RS4/RS6 are just plain fast.

225hp AWD TT's run high 14's, the only stock Audi's to run mid 14's are the S8 and the A6 TT.

No, the 225 TTs do low 14s.

i hope you meant the s4 TT v-6 cause the A6 doesnt even break 15 second zone... at least the ALLROAD quattro 5 spd doesnt (SAME MOTOR)

I'm sorry but there is no way in hell a stock TT Quattro runs low 14's, they run 14.7-14.9 they are fairly heavy cars... 3,400lbs+.

Yes, the twin turbo A6.

if ignorance is bliss then you must be the happiest person in the face of the planet

What he said. Yes they are low 14 second cars. With about $1500 they are in the 13's with no problem. Read a little about it. Before I bought mine I did a lot a research with consumer reports and read a lot of lit on it.

audi's are nice cars....thats all im saying..;) ;)

your right, i got on here to say how i broke my short throw shifter, and i thought i would throw a lie into the mix. Just so you can come in here to argue with me. But its a good thing i don't care what you say or think, isn't it? Im just telling you what i have done, thats all.

BTW, the 2000 Audi TT Quattro runs a 16.2 which is about where my civic is...so tell me again why i can't beat one? Is it because you said so? or wait you were just looking for an arugment so you though you would come into my thread and just babble non-senese and not know what you were talking about?

The final word....
 

Well, having owned an Audi, parents owned Audis, relatives owned Audis, and a member to the Audiworld forum, I would say I know a bit about these cars. First of all If it was a older Audi you raced (80s), there are a few FWD, Auto cars you could have beaten. They run about a high 10 0-60 mph. If it was an newer Audi, I guess you could have beaten a Auto, A6, 2.3 litre. those run a high 9, and you could have beaten a cabriolet, which runs a 10.3. Otherwise anything else would have smoked you.

are you talking 0-60? or 1/4?

stock my Ex runs a 9.1 0-60....

Yes 0-60
 

Heh, I doubt an A6 could run a 9 sec 1/4 mile, yes they are all 0-60 times.

Please.. you are making a fool of yourself by just making up bs. Wher did you get 16.2??? I searched the net for 4 seconds and got some times quickly off consumer reports. Try a 0-60 at 6.2 and a quarter mile time of 14.4. BTW Car and Driver confirms those same times, and Road and Track had the 0-60 mile time the same, and the 1/4 mile time at 14.2.

are you that stupid? I didn't make anything up. You see how "runs a 16.2" is underlined? that means its a link to another website. How did i make up what they put on there and says factory specs? its kind of like

this one. but in that one it runs a 16.1

or this one where it runs a 16.1. So me and those 3 websites all are wrong then huh? If you need to spend more time researching or just shut up before you start talking about shit you don't know about.

Side note, all the "this" are link to other websites, after you read through my reply. and you start to think im wrong, Click those links and they all say what i just said. I but i guess i made those up also.

I'm calling you a liar or anything, but my Si is faster than a TT?!?:confused:

*EDIT* I guess it is possible

00 Audi TT
Weight: 2910 lbs.
Acceleration (0-60 mph): 7.4 sec.
Base Number of Cylinders: 4
Base Engine Size: 1.8 liters
Base Engine Type: Inline 4
Horsepower: 180 hp
Max Horsepower: 5500 rpm
Torque: 173 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 1950 rpm

00 Honda Civic Si
Weight: 2601 lbs.
Acceleration (0-60 mph): 7.2 sec.
Base Number of Cylinders: 4
Base Engine Size: 1.6 liters
Base Engine Type: Inline 4
Horsepower: 160 hp
Max Horsepower: 7600 rpm
Torque: 111 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 7000 rpm

Damn Now I don't see the hype behind the TT.

the 2000. and yep. I put more links there becaus i "made up" the other ones. And i know i can beat a 16.1 because i can beat my brothers SI...

wait a minute.... you run 9.1 0-60 in your ex then your doing mid to HIGH 16's cause my jeep does like low 8's and i have some trouble getting outta 16's (but can)

LOFL!!! with 9.1 0-60??? your brother musta been short shifting you si's go 7.6 all day long

**EDIT** nm you said STOCK it did that... thats cool then i belive you what you got done to it :) ?

I think the 16.1 1/4m time is for a front wheel drive 180hp TT.

As for the 225hp TT Quattro I have a December Road and Track and they say 0-60 6.6-------1/4 mile 14.8@93.1mph.

I have yet to see any times for a stock Audi TT that says anything near to a low 14. Maybe like someone said with $1500 of modifications it run in the 13's, but sh*t most newer single turbo cars will run 13's with $1500 to spend.

Yeah, but the '00 TT's are slow. Well slower than they should be. I wouldn't pay that kinda cash for a 180HP car.

its the new 2002 si. It sucks for what it is. All i have is an intake exhast and a short throw. I can beat mike up till 95. after that i have to shift to 4th and then he walks away from me. Im not totaly killing him but i am slightly faster than him up till 95.

First off you keep talking about the '00 TT being slow. Well please tell me the difference between this TT and a '02 or '03 TT. These sources of yours also talk of a 150hp version which doesn't exist. There is a 180hp version which does the quarter in 15.6. Still, over a 1/2 second than your Si.

At first i thought you were just being an asshole. But now i relize you honestly are stupid. All 3 of the websites say 180 hp except for one. Those specs i gave are of a TT 1.8.

Even the god dam audi website says what i have been saying all along. ill quote it for you since you can'e seem to grasp it.



I guess audiworld.com has no idea what they are talking about.


heres another from a differnt site

They must be making all this up also.


Now i know you probly won't understand, but the third site is obviously a typo because the state it as having 180 in the article.


i don't have an SI as i said in the title to my thread, which you had to click on just to start shit.

Im talking about the 2000 being slow because you were dick and came here telling me how i couldn't have beat that car. When you don't know what car i even raced. Your a jackass and just need to shut up and stop coming into my thread and telling me what i did. taken from audiworld.com